|
|
| Hosting Method |
Description |
Pros |
Cons |
| Amazon S3 Static Website Hosting |
Host static websites directly on Amazon S3 buckets. |
Highly scalable, low cost, easy to set up, good for static content. |
Not suitable for dynamic content or server-side processing. |
| Amazon EC2 Instances |
Deploy websites on virtual servers in the cloud. |
Full control over server configuration, suitable for dynamic content. |
Requires more management, can be costly for small websites. |
| AWS Elastic Beanstalk |
Automatically handles the deployment, from capacity provisioning to load balancing. |
Easy to use, scalable, supports multiple programming languages. |
Less control over server configuration compared to EC2 instances. |
| AWS Lightsail |
Simple virtual private servers with pre-configured templates for easy website hosting. |
Easy to set up, predictable pricing, suitable for small to medium websites. |
Less flexibility compared to EC2 instances, limited scalability. |
| AWS CloudFront |
Content delivery network service to speed up distribution of your website content. |
Improves website performance, reduces latency, supports HTTPS. |
Additional cost for data transfer, configuration complexity. |
|
|
|