|
Option |
Description |
Pros |
Cons |
Azure App Service |
Deploy web applications and APIs easily with Azure App Service. Supports various programming languages and frameworks. |
Automatic scaling, high availability, easy deployment, integrated security features. |
Cost can increase with usage, limited control over server configurations. |
Azure Virtual Machines |
Create and manage virtual machines to host websites. Offers full control over server configurations. |
Customizable server configurations, ability to run any software, good for complex applications. |
Requires more management, potential for higher costs, scalability may be more complex. |
Azure Static Web Apps |
Host static websites with serverless architecture. Supports modern web technologies like JAMstack. |
Automatic scaling, low cost, easy deployment from GitHub, integrated CI/CD pipelines. |
Not suitable for dynamic content, limited server-side processing capabilities. |
Azure Functions |
Run serverless functions in response to events. Can be used to create serverless APIs or backend processes. |
Pay-per-use pricing, automatic scaling, easy integration with other Azure services. |
Limited execution time, may not be suitable for long-running processes. |
|
|